[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: <pre></pre> <Hx></Hx> BUG
From: |
Rob |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: <pre></pre> <Hx></Hx> BUG |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Apr 1998 00:27:26 +0100 (BST) |
Philip Webb wrote:
>
> amid all the speechifying, there is a perfectly good question:
> what should Lynx do if it encounters some other tag within <PRE>...</PRE> ?
Ideally? Follow the DTD and insert the implied </PRE>.
Realistically? Whatever the user is expecting it to do...
> that could be discussed, but there's a genuine point of debate here,
> which is currently being ignored.
As far as "correctness" goes, there's no point of debate - the authoritative
description of anything you call text/html is the DTD from W3C, and that
says you can't have Hx inside PRE. My personal opinion is that lynx shouldn't
contribute to the tag-soup mentality by ignoring incorrect markup. However,
I'm a self-confessed purist who doesn't really browse the web as such (I visit
about three sites occasionally), so I suspect I'm in a minority. I'd prefer
lynx to "do it right", but I'm not averse to lynx "doing it usefully" instead.
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: <pre></pre> <Hx></Hx> BUG, Jan Hlavacek, 1998/04/05
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: <pre></pre> <Hx></Hx> BUG, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/04/05
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: <pre></pre> <Hx></Hx> BUG, T.E.Dickey, 1998/04/07