[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Year 2000 Compliance
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Year 2000 Compliance |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Feb 1998 09:10:45 -0500 (EST) |
> I have done a code review of the Lynx code set (lynx-2.7.1ac-0.97, the
> newest I had at hand). I found a few minor Y2K issues, which should be
> fixed before 2.8 (if not already fixed in current development code).
thanks - I grep'd also last night, with a different slant (I look for 9's,
5's, 4's). The standalone mktime.c module also needs some attention.
> RECOMMENDATION: apply this patch.
thanks. will review/integrate.
> RECOMMENDATION: replace with code that decides based on the same
> criteria as above: >=70 is 19xx, otherwise 20xx.
ok
> RECOMMENDATION: delete parse_windows_nt_dir_entry() function if it's
> actually unnecessary.
there's probably more like this one - but we'll be looking for them...
> >Bela<
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- Re: LYNX-DEV Year 2000 Compliance, (continued)
- Re: LYNX-DEV Year 2000 Compliance, Personal, 1998/02/25
- Re: LYNX-DEV Year 2000 Compliance, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/02/26
- Re: LYNX-DEV Year 2000 Compliance, Bela Lubkin, 1998/02/26
- Re: LYNX-DEV Year 2000 Compliance,
T.E.Dickey <=
- Re: LYNX-DEV Year 2000 Compliance, Personal, 1998/02/27
- Re: LYNX-DEV Year 2000 Compliance, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/02/27
- Re: LYNX-DEV Year 2000 Compliance, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/02/27
- Re: LYNX-DEV Year 2000 Compliance, Bela Lubkin, 1998/02/28
- Re: LYNX-DEV Year 2000 Compliance, Personal, 1998/02/28