RE: LYNX-DEV Supression of messages in Lynx

[Eric Anderson]

Would ANYONE show me where in my ORIGINAL question, I said anything
about modifying code and keeping it secret?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark H. Wood [SMTP:address@hidden
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 1998 8:21 AM
> To:   address@hidden
> Subject:      RE: LYNX-DEV Supression of messages in Lynx
> 
> On Thu, 19 Feb 1998, Nelson Henry Eric wrote:
> 
> > > >do not renege on your obligation to make your source code public.
> > > 
> > > There is no such obligation; under the GPL, a recipient of a
> derivitive
> >                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Correct.  (But might I add, _only_ correct.)  It is my personal
> > opinion that there is an obligation to the lynx-dev community and
> > the Lynx user base.
> 
> Another way of saying this is that, if you want to be treated
> collegially
> by other developers (that is, have them share their labor and insights
> with you), you should do them the same courtesy.  We don't have a
> business
> relationship, but a social one.  Sometimes that's hard to remember
> since
> we're exercising it in a business setting, but it's true. 
> 
> -- 
> Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer   address@hidden
> One more time:  a (level-2) switch is a bridge.  A "level-3 switch" is
> a router.  Deal with it.