Re: LYNX-DEV extension languages for Lynx

[Matt Ackeret]

On 8 Jan 1998, Jason F. McBrayer wrote:
>>>>>> "MA" == Matt Ackeret <address@hidden> writes:
>MA> On Thu, 8 Jan 1998, David Combs wrote:
>>> If we rewrite Lynx from scratch, lets at least
>>> do it in JAVA (assuming that java will eventually
>>> work on dos -- without "windows"-display stuff.
>MA> If you have some magical Java that runs on a UNIX system with a
>MA> tty interface, great.
>Wasn't someone working on a curses implementation/subset of AWT
>recently?  Anyway, Java doesn't necessarily imply a window-system.

I guess we're starting to get off topic here, but I was under
the impression that Java, or at least the "standard" libraries (AWT?),
assumed a bitmapped display..  I mean, except for the "console" window
you see spit out errors, everything in Java seems very GUI-y.