[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field
|
From: |
Nelson Henry Eric |
|
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Nov 1997 15:39:14 +0900 (JST) |
> I second the proposal to disable the automatic inclusion of the two lines that
> make the document invalid HTML.
"Proposal", bear in mind, was for an _option_ to disable. The reasons
for wanting the automatic inclusion of X-URL and BASE are valid. (See
past discussion on this topic in the archives.)
__Henry
- Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, (continued)
Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, Foteos Macrides, 1997/11/23
Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, Foteos Macrides, 1997/11/24
Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, Foteos Macrides, 1997/11/25
Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, Nelson Henry Eric, 1997/11/25
Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, Michael Sokolov, 1997/11/25
Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field,
Nelson Henry Eric <=
Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, Michael Sokolov, 1997/11/26
Re: LYNX-DEV X-URL header field, David Combs, 1997/11/27