Re: more on INSTALLATION [was Re: LYNX-DEV Thanks! DOS Compile works now]

[Wayne Buttles]

> On Wed, 29 Oct 1997, Nelson Henry Eric wrote:
> 
> > Can't make everyone happy, but I think the following does establish
> > what programs are preferred, is thorough in its treatment of pkunzip,

You are right, you can't make everyone happy, be concise and be 100%
technically correct all at the same time.  Your instructions would mess me
all up in that I compile for both djgpp AND win32 using the same code set 
and try to do diff stuff in and out. 

Does that need to be pointed out?  I don't know.  I like what you have
done so far.  In my opinion, no one really should be compiling both.  I
was only doing it because people wanted a dos version and I had the
ability to generate one.  I would much rather that someone with a greater
interest in the dos version took over (I would be happy to still host the
binary and stuff).

---------------------

And now for a little plain fun -- I thought this was mildly interesting.
Here is a raw web log excerpt (including duplicate accesses of course)
from 19/Aug/1997:08:35:56 till now.

grep -c lynx_386.zip access_log
1971

grep -c lynx_w32.zip access_log 
8703 

;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE:  Send a mail message to address@hidden
;                  with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
;                  quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;