Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx development process

[Bela Lubkin]

Michael Sokolov wrote:

>    I propose that the Lynx development process be made a bit more formal.

Mike Brown replied:

> No one is going to argue with that, but from what I have seen, no one

I beg to differ.  I think the process works fine the way it is.  Wasting
people's energies on formalizing the process will only reduce the amount
of actual development that occurs.

Yes, the Lynx development process is anarchic.  So what: the results are
good.

All that's needed is a "code collector" -- formerly Fote, then Klaus for
a while, now perhaps Fote is drifting back into that role, or maybe
someone else will.  I am confident that *someone* will.  And if not, why
would anyone imagine that a set of formal rules would have changed that?

>Bela<
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE:  Send a mail message to address@hidden
;                  with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
;                  quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;