[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: mkstemp source
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: mkstemp source |
Date: |
Sat, 10 May 1997 06:41:24 -0400 (EDT) |
> 3. Rename the function. Since we changed the number of arguments, then
> I propose we use a different name, to prevent confusion with the default
> one. While the linker would be fine with this, I believe it is best not
actually, some linkers (including the Linux loader) do get confused.
> int
> -mkstemp (template, xstart)
> +mkstempx (template, xstart)
probably LYmkstemp would be more in line with the code
> +/*static const char letters[] */
> +/* Why does gcc complain if I leave the const in? */
check the c-preprocessor expansion, it'll probably show the problem.
> + static char letters[]
> = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789";
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., (continued)
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Scott McGee (Personal), 1997/05/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Scott McGee (Personal), 1997/05/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Scott McGee (Personal), 1997/05/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Jonathan Sergent, 1997/05/09
- LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx - code, Klaus Weide, 1997/05/09
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx - code, Jonathan Sergent, 1997/05/10
- LYNX-DEV Re: mkstemp source, Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1997/05/10
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: mkstemp source,
T.E.Dickey <=
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: mkstemp source, Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1997/05/10
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: mkstemp source, Jonathan Sergent, 1997/05/10
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: mkstemp source, Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1997/05/10
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Nelson Henry Eric, 1997/05/09