[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV [Fwd: BoS: A vulnerability in Lynx (all versions)]
|
From: |
Alan Cox |
|
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV [Fwd: BoS: A vulnerability in Lynx (all versions)] |
|
Date: |
Wed, 7 May 1997 17:30:51 +0100 (BST) |
> Other than that, it looks okay, except that using the numeric signal codes
> is more portable than using the mnemonics.
Only on OS's that they are the same - which is almost but not quite everything
that looks like Unix
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
Re: LYNX-DEV [Fwd: BoS: A vulnerability in Lynx (all versions)], Benjamin C. W. Sittler, 1997/05/07
Re: LYNX-DEV [Fwd: BoS: A vulnerability in Lynx (all versions)],
Alan Cox <=
RE: LYNX-DEV [Fwd: BoS: A vulnerability in Lynx (all versions)], Brian Tillman, x8425, 1997/05/07
Re: LYNX-DEV [Fwd: BoS: A vulnerability in Lynx (all versions)], Scott McGee (Personal), 1997/05/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV [Fwd: BoS: A vulnerability in Lynx (all versions)], Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1997/05/07
- LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Klaus Weide, 1997/05/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Alan Cox, 1997/05/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Jim Spath (Webmaster Jim), 1997/05/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Alan Cox, 1997/05/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Jim Spath (Webmaster Jim), 1997/05/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Jonathan Sergent, 1997/05/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV Re: ...vulnerability in Lynx..., Alan Cox, 1997/05/08