Re: LYNX-DEV Base Release

[Foteos Macrides]

Roger Hill <address@hidden> wrote:
>On Fri, 14 Mar 1997, Scott McGee (Personal) wrote:
>
>> Roger,
>> 
>> I would suggest asking Fote what he thinks of your 2.7.1 suggestion. He is
>> currently publishing the bugfixes, and if he doesn't mind publising them
>> against 2.7.1 instead, then I see no real problem. If, however, he prefers
>> not to, I see 2.7.1 as pretty useless as it would rather quickly grow
>> outdated and useless.
>> 
>Agreed: but as 2.7.1 would still be all Fote, it should not (I hope) be a
>problem.  
>
>What say you, Fote?

        If we go a week or two without any more serious bug reports,
I don't see a problem with putting out a "bug fix" release designated
v2.7.1 and containing the 27bugfixes.zip replacement files, with
BUGFIXES converted to additional CHANGES entries.  That shouldn't
affect the "merged/all" development code set since Klaus has been
incorporating the bug fixes and giving it a distinct version string.

        If, however, it escalated into greater expectations than that...

                                Fote

=========================================================================
 Foteos Macrides            Worcester Foundation for Biomedical Research
 address@hidden         222 Maple Avenue, Shrewsbury, MA 01545
=========================================================================
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE:  Send a mail message to address@hidden
;                  with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
;                  quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;