[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV UL Block with plain
From: |
Sinan Kaan Yerli |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV UL Block with plain |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Nov 1996 21:36:10 +0000 (GMT) |
On Wed, 6 Nov 1996, Foteos Macrides wrote:
> I don't follow your illustration, but from your verbal description
>you are seeing what is intended, i.e. that the bullet is omitted but the
>first line of actual text in the LI starts in the same place it would have
>with a bullet (defined via the "first line indent" in the stylesheet, and
>and subsequent lines of the same LI start at the "second line indent"
>setting. In effect, the "bullet" for PLAIN is
OK. Got it. But, why is the "second line indent" applied for the rest of
the text on the block when PLAIN in effect. Why not carry on with the
"first line indent" or aplly "second line indent" for the whole block if
PLAIN is in effect?
Here is the example:
1234567
<ul>
+ a long line .............................. last word
wraps here.
<ul plain>
a long line .............................. last word
wraps here.
<ul plain> <==== what I want
a long line .............................. last word
wraps here.
- or -
a long line .............................. last word
wraps here.
where "first line indent" is '5' and "second line indent" is '7'
For me this looks much sensible because it is consistent for all the
_lines_ in the block. At least in the indentation of the text. Will it
violate any rules (internal/extarnal) in this way?
best wishes,
--
Sinan Kaan Yerli <address@hidden>
University of Sussex, CPES, Astronomy Centre, Brighton, BN1 9QH, UK
+44 (1273) 678604 -- fax: +44 (1273) 678097
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;