Re: [lwip-users] [Bulk] Re: the sequentiality of the lwip stack

[address@hidden]

Gisle Vanem wrote:
> Me too. A socket-handle should only be an index into some
> process-global table. So (comparing to other OS'es), there
> should be nothing preventing us using sockets across threads.

There's nothing preventing you from using a socket across threads. You 
only can't use it from more than one thread *at the same time*. This 
would be a special case which would have to be taken care of (and is 
not, yet, to keep the code small).

Simon