[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lwip-users] [Bulk] Re: the sequentiality of the lwip stack

From: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] [Bulk] Re: the sequentiality of the lwip stack
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 21:46:22 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0

Gisle Vanem wrote:
Me too. A socket-handle should only be an index into some
process-global table. So (comparing to other OS'es), there
should be nothing preventing us using sockets across threads.

There's nothing preventing you from using a socket across threads. You only can't use it from more than one thread *at the same time*. This would be a special case which would have to be taken care of (and is not, yet, to keep the code small).


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]