lwip-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lwip-users] coap on lwip


From: Ivan Delamer
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] coap on lwip
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 08:55:08 -0700 (MST)
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a

Do you plan on using Coap over 6LowPAN with LwIP? I haven't seen a 6LowPAN
netif implementation but it is a desirable contribution and one that I'd
be happy to integrate to LwIP if there was an implementation available.

Cheers
Ivan


> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:18:04 +0100
> From: chrysn <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [lwip-users] coap on lwip
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> hello lwip-users,
>
> have you hever heard of or seen an implementation of coap (constrained
> application protocol[1]) atop native lwip?
>
> everything i've seen so far is based on contiki/uip, but i'd need coap
> and serious tcp inside the same device.
>
> as a warning to whoever wants to look for such implementations, beware
> that the ietf runs an "lwip" mailing list dedicated to lightweight ip
> stacks in general[2], so a plain search for "lwip coap" produces many
> false hits.
>
> the only link i've found so far is [3] (which is people discussing it
> would be cool to have).
>
> regards
> chrysn
>
> [1] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-coap/
> [2] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
> [3] http://forum.chibios.org/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=287
>
> --
> To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely vulnerable to greater
> powers.
>   -- Bene Gesserit axiom
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 836 bytes
> Desc: Digital signature
> URL:
> <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/lwip-users/attachments/20130114/a8fc97cf/attachment.pgp>





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]