lwip-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lwip-users] lwIP performance with FreeRTOS


From: Chris Ponder
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] lwIP performance with FreeRTOS
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:43:39 +0000

Lol, that is no problem, it is good to have the help J

 

Yes that is still a long way from what I had hoped for. I had thought that the drop from standalone+raw to RTOS+netconn would only be 2 or 3 Mbps at most, half seems a  little drastic.

 

Thanks again

Chris

 

From: address@hidden
Sent: 24 February 2012 14:35
To: Mailing list for lwIP users
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] lwIP performance with FreeRTOS

 

Chris Ponder wrote:

Ahh, that helps J


Hehe, sorry for the confusion. I'm didn't have access to the lwIP sources when writing that.


Yes the correct macro is LWIP_TCPIP_CORE_LOCKING and increased the speed to 45.3 Mbps, getting better J


Hmm, that's still only half of what you get with the raw API, is it? I would have expected it to be better...

Simon

********************************************************

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution, or other dissemination or use of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in
error please notify the sender immediately and then delete this e-mail.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free as
information could be intercepted, corrupted lost, destroyed, arrive late or
incomplete, or contain viruses.
The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions
in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail
transmission. If verification is required please request a hard copy
version.

********************************************************


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]