|
From: | address@hidden |
Subject: | Re: [lwip-users] Fw: (no subject) |
Date: | Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:05:37 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 |
Kieran Mansley wrote:
I certainly would hope so, too. Although there have been fixes which might add some opcodes, I wouldn't have expected it to be noticably slower than 1.3.2...but I would also hope that 1.4.0 would perform as well if not better without zero-copy.
Again, agreed. I'd love to have a look at comparable packet captures, but an excerpt of 10 or 20 seconds (in the range of 100KBytes, I guess?) might probably be enough to see a difference?I think your packet captures have been held waiting for me to approve them as the attachments are so large. Perhaps you could get a smaller capture? Or upload them somewhere we can access them. I don't really like forwarding many megabytes to everyone on the mailing list. Being able to compare the 1.4.0 behaviour to the 1.3.0 behaviour would probably help too.
Simon
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |