[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AW: [lwip-users] LWIP and second IP feasible?
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
Re: AW: [lwip-users] LWIP and second IP feasible? |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Mar 2011 17:26:18 +0000 |
On 7 Mar 2011, at 16:20, Tyrel Newton wrote:
> On the other hand, supporting this on the driver should be much simpler. A
> "global" driver that:
> - doesn't store its state information in the netif->state field
> - provides a locking mechanism (i.e mutex)
> should be enough. This would allow you to multiplex two netifs using the same
> driver. And it shouldn't matter which netif you pass incoming packets to
> either.
If you could flesh this idea out and add it as a task on savannah that would
help us if/when this feature comes to be implemented.
Thanks
Kieran
- Re: AW: [lwip-users] LWIP and second IP feasible?, (continued)
- Re: AW: [lwip-users] LWIP and second IP feasible?, Kieran Mansley, 2011/03/06
- SV: AW: [lwip-users] LWIP and second IP feasible?, Emil Ljungdahl, 2011/03/07
- RE: AW: [lwip-users] LWIP and second IP feasible?, Hugh Reynolds, 2011/03/07
- Re: AW: [lwip-users] LWIP and second IP feasible?, Simon Goldschmidt, 2011/03/12
- RE: AW: [lwip-users] LWIP and second IP feasible?, Hugh Reynolds, 2011/03/12
- [lwip-users] porting lwip to uC/OSII, LI Zhong, 2011/03/14
- Re: [lwip-users] porting lwip to uC/OSII, Kieran Mansley, 2011/03/14
- [lwip-users] how to use loopif in embedded system, LI Zhong, 2011/03/30
- AW: AW: [lwip-users] LWIP and second IP feasible?, Delta Control - Bernd Uttich, 2011/03/09
- Re: AW: [lwip-users] LWIP and second IP feasible?, Tyrel Newton, 2011/03/07
- Re: AW: [lwip-users] LWIP and second IP feasible?,
Kieran Mansley <=