|
| From: | Bill Auerbach |
| Subject: | RE: [lwip-users] Non-blocking netconn_write? |
| Date: | Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:21:32 -0400 |
>> for safety of people around the device. > >"for safety"? That worries me! Me too! I would add a UDP pinging type of feature that is the minimum time that you can live without the connection. A missing ping means it's disconnected (effectively). I did this with a 1/2 time ping so I needed to miss 2 pings to be disconnected just in case one is dropped. Bill
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |