lwip-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [lwip-users] PBUFS + MEMP + LWIP 1.3.0


From: Boulanger, Cyrille
Subject: RE: [lwip-users] PBUFS + MEMP + LWIP 1.3.0
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:57:43 +0100

Hi Sirjee,

> Is there a port of 1.3.2 for the ATMEL UC3A0512 device?
Yes, it's available in a pre-release of the AVR UC3 Software Framework 1.7 
here: http://www.atmel.no/beta_ware/

Regards,

Cyrille.
.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> address@hidden 
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Sirjee Rooplall
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 11:43 AM
> To: Mailing list for lwIP users
> Subject: Re: [lwip-users] PBUFS + MEMP + LWIP 1.3.0
> Importance: High
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Is there a port of 1.3.2 for the ATMEL UC3A0512 device?
> 
> If no where can I get the 1.3.2 LWIP stack.
> 
> I am using PPP, and at the moment I am trying to track a bug 
> that causes my 
> system to crash, and when I stop me debugger it points to the 
> PPPthreadHandle. The failure seems to occur in the function 
> pppInProc() 
> everytime.
> 
> The change log, does not show any changes to the PPP code,  
> so I am just 
> worried that I am going to waste alot more time to get the 
> port done and 
> face the same problems.
> 
> I have seen in a website that when physical layer is not 
> present i.e modem 
> in my case that the pppThread must be removed.
> And that implementation of the thread remove used a function called 
> sys_arch_thread_remove, which does not appear in the LWIP 
> 1.3.0, sys_arch.c 
> file.
> 
> Is there an example of proper use of the LWIP PPP stack that 
> I can look at 
> to get some pointers.
> 
> The reason I started looking at the memory, is beacuse 
> normally these kind 
> of system crashes is related to memory mismanagement or 
> messed up pointers.
> 
> Please bear with me, as I may ask some question which may 
> seem dumb, but I 
> am fairly new to LWIP stack, and I am trying to get my head 
> around its 
> workings.
> 
> The only reason my emails are marked High Priority is because 
> when I send 
> emails, I want the server to send them immediately without 
> any delays, and 
> it has no relevance to your response time, however I thank 
> you for you promt 
> response.
> 
> 
> Kind Regards, Sirjee Rooplall Figment Design laboratories 
> (Pty) Ltd mailto: 
> address@hidden Mobile: +27 (0)83 230 8466
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Simon Goldschmidt" <address@hidden>
> To: "Mailing list for lwIP users" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 12:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [lwip-users] PBUFS + MEMP + LWIP 1.3.0
> 
> 
> >
> > "Sirjee Rooplall" wrote:
> >> seen in website:
> >> 
> http://lwip.wikia.com/wiki/Lwipopts.h#Memory_management_.28RAM
> _usage.29
> >>
> >> However I cannot see where these difnes will be used in 
> LWIP port 1.3.0.
> >
> > There have been a lot of changes since 1.3.0, one of them 
> is moving heap 
> > and memp-pools to user-defined sections. Like others, I'd 
> suggest moving 
> > to 1.3.2.
> >
> > PS: is there any specific reason you mark your emails as 
> "high priority"?
> >
> > Simon
> > -- 
> > NEU: Mit GMX DSL über 1000,- ¿ sparen!
> > http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lwip-users mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]