Re: [lwip-users] link down and netconn problem

[Kieran Mansley]

On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 16:09 +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> I haven't yet understood why we have fatal errors at all: If the user 
> (application) wants the stack to retry, why not? All that fatal error 
> handling only leads to errors noone understands, anyway... And all
> that 
> only because we want to prevent running some code when we *suspect*
> we 
> had a fatal error and it would go wrong later?

I hadn't considered getting rid of them altogether, but you make a good
case for it.  Interestingly, CVS says you added the ERR_IS_FATAL macro
so if you don't understand what they're for, I'm guessing that no one
does!

Kieran