Re: [lwip-users] TCP causing out of mem pool [RAW]

[address@hidden]

Roger Cover wrote:
> Howdy Folks,
>
> In terms of the message, perhaps a more clear message would be in order.
> Something like:
>
> No free PCBs. Using a TIME_WAIT PCB.
>   

That's what I thought of. The problem (and why it won't make it into 
1.3.1) is that the current message is a generic message emitted in 
memp_malloc(), which doesn't know that the failure isn't fatal to TCP. 
Nevertheless, it's confusing users.

Simon