RE: Re: [lwip-users] Re: tx badnwidth

[Bill Auerbach]

>The above two settings are much too small to expect decent throughput,
>and almost certainly explain the poor performance in the 2048-byte-write
>capture you sent.  You can probably get away with leaving TCP_WND alone
>if you're acting purely as a sender of packets, but TCP_SND_BUF should
>be as large as you can make it.

Kieran, can the PBUF_POOL_SIZE 6 also be a problem?

Bill