[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] ip_reass
From: |
Jonathan Larmour |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] ip_reass |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:35:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070530) |
Ed Sutter wrote:
> Hey folks,,
> I'm using 1.3.0, been running fine for quite a while now.
> I just crashed somewhere in ip_reass() as a result of an
> incoming IP fragment (MF bit set in header). Are there any
> known problems with IP_REASSEMBLY in lwip1.3.0?
I know of an issue with fragmentation, but not reassembly:
https://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?6528
If anything the discussion there shows that reassembly should work.
Jifl
--
eCosCentric Limited http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos experts
Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 1223 245571
Registered in England and Wales: Reg No 4422071.
------["Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere"]------ Opinions==mine
- [lwip-users] ip_reass, Ed Sutter, 2008/10/08
- Re: [lwip-users] ip_reass,
Jonathan Larmour <=
- Re: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Ed Sutter, 2008/10/09
- R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Ceresoli Luca, 2008/10/10
- Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Ed Sutter, 2008/10/10
- Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Kieran Mansley, 2008/10/10
- Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, address@hidden, 2008/10/10
- Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Kieran Mansley, 2008/10/10
- Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Ed Sutter, 2008/10/11
- Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Simon Goldschmidt, 2008/10/11
- Re: R: [lwip-users] ip_reass, Ed Sutter, 2008/10/11
- Re: [lwip-users] ip_reass, address@hidden, 2008/10/17