[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing send andreceive on a
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing send andreceive on a single port |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:24:11 +0000 |
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 11:11 +0000, Julian Gardner [RSD] wrote:
> Ive done
>
> sock = socket( AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_UDP);
>
> memset( ( void * )&sockAddr, 0, sizeof( struct sockaddr_in ) );
> sockAddr.sin_family = AF_INET;
> sockAddr.sin_addr.s_addr = INADDR_ANY;
> sockAddr.sin_port = port;
> if( bind( sock, ( struct sockaddr * )&sockAddr, sizeof( sockAddr ) )
> !=0)
> {
> }
>
> Now do i need to do anything else to make this bi-directional?.
I'm still not clear what you're trying to achieve.
All sockets are by default one-to-one and bi-directional.
If you just need to do bi-directional communication between two
computers (A sends to B, B sends back to A), you should get that with no
trouble at all with a normal socket.
If you want three computers (i.e. A sends to B, and B sends to C) then B
will need two sockets. It can't use one socket for both receiving from
A and sending to C as sockets are normally just one-to-one. Both those
sockets can be on the same address and port at B (I think) though. You
may have to be a bit careful about how you bind them to ensure they
don't "overlap".
You may, if that doesn't fulfill your needs, be able to do something
with multicast (as then the socket isn't just one-to-one) but that's a
whole different kettle of fish.
Kieran
- [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing send and receive on a single port, Julian Gardner [RSD], 2008/01/21
- Re: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing send and receive on a single port, Kieran Mansley, 2008/01/21
- RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing send andreceive on a single port, Julian Gardner [RSD], 2008/01/21
- RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing send andreceive on a single port,
Kieran Mansley <=
- RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing sendandreceive on a single port, Julian Gardner [RSD], 2008/01/21
- RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing sendandreceive on a single port, Kieran Mansley, 2008/01/21
- RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing sendandreceiveon a single port, Julian Gardner [RSD], 2008/01/21
- RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing sendandreceiveon a single port, Kieran Mansley, 2008/01/21
- RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing sendandreceiveona single port, Taranowski, Thomas (SWCOE), 2008/01/23
- RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing sendandreceive on a single port, Taranowski, Thomas (SWCOE), 2008/01/23