[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization
From: |
Goldschmidt Simon |
Subject: |
RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:15:02 +0100 |
> Don't forget that the majority of ports are going to be
> archived soon as there are no maintainers for them.
So change it or leave it? Using an old port on a new version seems good
to me, if it works, so that would tell me to leave it the way it is. On
the other hand, I'm thinking about it the way Thomas does. If we don't
need the callback, why stick to it? It's only leaving something away and
not implementing something new, after all.
Simon
- [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Goldschmidt Simon, 2007/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Dmitry Potapov, 2007/03/03
- Re: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Kieran Mansley, 2007/03/05
- RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Goldschmidt Simon, 2007/03/05
- RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Kieran Mansley, 2007/03/05
- RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Taranowski, Thomas \(SWCOE\), 2007/03/05
- RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Kieran Mansley, 2007/03/05
- RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization,
Goldschmidt Simon <=
- RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Kieran Mansley, 2007/03/05