[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL
|
From: |
Goldschmidt Simon |
|
Subject: |
RE: [lwip-users] Bug in pbuf.c regarding PBUF_POOL |
|
Date: |
Fri, 6 Oct 2006 13:11:01 +0200 |
Hi,
I got still 2 comments on the locking:
1. If acces to pbuf pool was not supposed to be thread-safe, why are
pbuf_pool_free_lock and pbuf_pool_alloc_lock declared volatile?
2. @Christiaan regarding
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lwip-devel/2006-03/msg00000.html:
There is no double-locking since SYS_ARCH_PROTECT macros are defined to
do nothing if (SYS_LIGHTWEIGHT_PROT == 0).
Simon