Re: [lwip-users] tcp_tmr - TCP_TMR_INTERVAL

[Hampus Thorell]

Should it be set to 250? I've seen some places (this forum for instance) 
where people seem to have set it to 100.

Hampus

Kieran Mansley wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 10:32 +0200, Hampus Thorell wrote:
> > Yes, the information was very valuable.
> >
> > However, I was thinking of decreasing the TCP_TMR_INTERVAL which is set 
> > to default 250 in my version to for instance 1, do you believe this 
> > would corrupt anything?
>
> Yes.  Instead of waiting a second or two for an acknowledgement before
> retransmitting a packet, it would wait only a few milliseconds, which
> may be less than the round trip time of your network.  This would result
> in a flood of retransmissions.  
>
> Kieran
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users