[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] [lwip] Comments, bugfixes and thanks
From: |
Adam Dunkels |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] [lwip] Comments, bugfixes and thanks |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Jan 2003 00:19:46 -0000 |
Hi!
I have been slightly absent from this list for a while, but I'll take a shot
at it tonight before going off to vacation tomorrow. I have added the
bugfixes and commited the CVS. Hopefully I didn't miss anything.
Unfortunately I haven't had enough time on my hands to sit down and finish
the 0.6 version, and I'll be away for the next four weeks.
I'll summarize a few of the answers in this mail instead of replying to each
one.
Bernard Shyu: Since only the SYN is acked for SYN segments with data, no data
will actually be lost (the data will be retransmitted). SYN+data segments are
rare so it isn't really a big problem.
Leon: Thanks a lot for you patches! I have put them into the CVS version.
Biren: THanks for your tcp_input window fix!
John Recker: Thanks for your pbuf stuff!
Jason: The sysadmins are installing virus and spam filters on the mailserver
so it hopefully is the end of viruses on this list.
Jani: Thanks for pointing out the stupid tcp_input.c bug! Also for the UDP
stuff in api_msg.c.
Florian: I'm really really sorry for misspelling your name!
Paul: That was a really stupid one is tcp_listen :-) Also thanks for pointing
out the stuff in etharp.c and the tcp_abort() stuff.
Xavier Hanin: Thanks for the IP ID fix! It isn't a fatal bug, however, since
IP IDs only need to be unique and not incrementing by one.
/adam
--
Adam Dunkels <address@hidden>
http://www.sics.se/~adam
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]