lwip-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lwip-users] [lwip] Comments, bugfixes and thanks


From: Adam Dunkels
Subject: [lwip-users] [lwip] Comments, bugfixes and thanks
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 00:19:46 -0000

Hi!

I have been slightly absent from this list for a while, but I'll take a shot 
at it tonight before going off to vacation tomorrow. I have added the 
bugfixes and commited the CVS. Hopefully I didn't miss anything. 

Unfortunately I haven't had enough time on my hands to sit down and finish 
the 0.6 version, and I'll be away for the next four weeks.

I'll summarize a few of the answers in this mail instead of replying to each 
one.

Bernard Shyu: Since only the SYN is acked for SYN segments with data, no data 
will actually be lost (the data will be retransmitted). SYN+data segments are 
rare so it isn't really a big problem.

Leon: Thanks a lot for you patches! I have put them into the CVS version.

Biren: THanks for your tcp_input window fix!

John Recker: Thanks for your pbuf stuff!

Jason: The sysadmins are installing virus and spam filters on the mailserver 
so it hopefully is the end of viruses on this list.

Jani: Thanks for pointing out the stupid tcp_input.c bug! Also for the UDP 
stuff in api_msg.c.

Florian: I'm really really sorry for misspelling your name! 

Paul: That was a really stupid one is tcp_listen :-) Also thanks for pointing 
out the stuff in etharp.c and the tcp_abort() stuff.

Xavier Hanin: Thanks for the IP ID fix! It isn't a fatal bug, however, since 
IP IDs only need to be unique and not incrementing by one.

/adam
-- 
Adam Dunkels <address@hidden>
http://www.sics.se/~adam
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]