[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Re: lwIP on DSPs
From: |
Adam Dunkels |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Re: lwIP on DSPs |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Jan 2003 23:46:57 -0000 |
Hi!
On Tuesday 04 December 2001 09.44, you wrote:
> in response to Bill Knight; my stack indeed uses macro's (#define's) that
> pack and unpack bytes into/out of 16-bit words.
>
> The reason was a hardware legacy, some hardware design of ours did not have
> individual byte accesses enabled,
> and acted on 16-bit words. In fact, I'm planning to remove these #define's
> as we need to redesign the hardware anyway.
And lwIP is moving in the opposite direction - the new version will use
#defines for header values ;-)
Is your DHCP port working yet by the way?
/adam
--
Adam Dunkels <address@hidden>
http://www.sics.se/~adam
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Re: lwIP on DSPs, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Re: lwIP on DSPs, Bill Knight, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Re: lwIP on DSPs, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Re: lwIP on DSPs, Bill Knight, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Re: lwIP on DSPs,
Adam Dunkels <=
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Re: lwIP on DSPs, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Re: lwIP on DSPs, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Re: lwIP on DSPs, leon . woestenberg, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Re: lwIP on DSPs, Bill Knight, 2003/01/09