[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Initialization Sequence
From: |
leon . woestenberg |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Initialization Sequence |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Jan 2003 23:22:11 -0000 |
Hello Adam,
in followup to John's question. A function that closes all connections
and their resources, might be very handy (hint :), also in the light of
DHCP support.
Suppose all conections have been closed, what's the neatest way of
ignoring new connection attempts?
1) Removing the interfaces.
2) Zeroing the interfaces IP addresses
3) ... something completely different?
Leon.
Adam Dunkels
<address@hidden> To: address@hidden
Sent by: cc:
address@hidden Subject: Re: [lwip] Initialization
Sequence
s.se
20-12-01 13:45
Please respond
to lwip
Hi John!
On Wednesday 19 December 2001 23:05, you wrote:
> ...
> Another unrelated question: Are there ramifications of changing an IP
> address with the stack running?
It will cause problems for connections that are running when the change is
made. But other than that, it should work.
/adam
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Initialization Sequence, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Initialization Sequence, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Initialization Sequence, leon . woestenberg, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Initialization Sequence, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Initialization Sequence, John C. Toman, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Initialization Sequence,
leon . woestenberg <=
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] Initialization Sequence, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/09