[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] problems with tcp_segs
From: |
Andrea Olivotto |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] problems with tcp_segs |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Jan 2003 22:34:25 -0000 |
Hi Jani,
I'm using MEM_SIZE == 8000, so I don't think it would be useful. And more
important, this would be a patch.
I think there is a problem in memp manager: this memory manager need
allcation and deallocation in a proper order.
What would happen if in some cases lwIP deallocates a tcp_seg before
another, not in order?
Do you think I'll solve my problem trying the new cvs? Is it stable?
I just tried it in linux, there is some problems using http and shell
together when tcp needs to reclaim tcp_pcb.
James, did you solve your problem? Please... :-)
> Hi
> I just had that problem yesterday and it went away if I increased the
> heap size used by memp_malloc(MEM_SIZE which is 1000 by default).
>
> Jani.
>
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] problems with tcp_segs, James Roth, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] problems with tcp_segs,
Andrea Olivotto <=
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] problems with tcp_segs, James Roth, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] problems with tcp_segs, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] problems with tcp_segs, Andrea Olivotto, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] problems with tcp_segs, Andrea Olivotto, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] problems with tcp_segs, Jani Monoses, 2003/01/09