[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lwip-devel] [patch #9454] IPV6 ready test on RFC2460

From: Jisu Kim
Subject: [lwip-devel] [patch #9454] IPV6 ready test on RFC2460
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 06:42:49 -0400 (EDT)
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/60.0.3112.113 Safari/537.36


                 Summary: IPV6 ready test on RFC2460
                 Project: lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack
            Submitted by: bossrlawltn
            Submitted on: Fri 15 Sep 2017 10:42:48 AM UTC
                Category: IPv6
                Priority: 5 - Normal
                  Status: None
                 Privacy: Public
             Assigned to: None
        Originator Email: 
             Open/Closed: Open
         Discussion Lock: Any
         Planned Release: None



patch for the IPV6 Ready test (RFC2460)

changed features according to RFC2460:
  IPV6 reassemble time recommended above 60 seconds.

  icmp6_param_problem() sends an exact offset to point the error.

  icmp6_param_problem() sends the pointer in network byte order.

  Hop-by-Hop option header must be the first option.

  Hop-by-Hop, Destination option header structures consist of next option type
and header length field basically, and TLV(Type-Length-Value) option header
comes by the number in header length field.
  If header length field is 0, one TLV option header comes after the
Hop-by-Hop, Destination option header.
  The option_type in TLV option header is not recognized and 2 MSB of the
option_type is not 0, it is handled as a exception.

  Added definitions of TLV option header type. ex) IP6_PAD1_OPTION
  Send ICMP parameter field problem if unrecognized routing type is received.

  Added exception handling in the routing header.

  When there are more fragments(Mbit is not zero), payload_length field in
IPV6 header must be the multiple of 8


File Attachments:

Date: Fri 15 Sep 2017 10:42:48 AM UTC  Name: lwip_rfc2460.patch  Size: 23KiB  
By: bossrlawltn



Reply to this item at:


  Message sent via/by Savannah

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]