Re: [lwip-devel] IGMP: Possible missing state transition?

[Ryan Mullen]

Hello,

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:24 PM, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:

Ryan Mullen wrote:

I was browsing the code in core/ipv4/igmp.c and I am a bit confused by the means by which the multicast group state gets set to IGMP_GROUP_IDLE_MEMBER.
[..]
Shouldn't the group get set into IGMP_GROUP_IDLE_MEMBER state from igmp_timeout()?

>From looking at the RFC, your observation looks correct. Would you mind adding a bug report at savannah?

Sure, not a problem. I appreciate the sanity check.

Ryan