[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lwip-devel] sockets without threads?

From: Kieran Mansley
Subject: Re: [lwip-devel] sockets without threads?
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:20:30 +0100

On 21 Jun 2012, at 17:45, Colin Nichols wrote:
> However, now that the capabilities of the API have grown, I can't help but 
> wonder if there might be a more concise, simple implementation based directly 
> off the raw API?  I'd be really curious to benchmark such an implementation 
> vs the current one in terms of speed, executable size, and memory usage... 
> Has anyone ever thought about doing this?  If not -- I might give it a try 
> later this summer...

Yes, it has been much thought about and is generally agreed to be a good idea.  
I think this is a good place to see where we got to when developers last had 
the time and inclination to work on it:


There was much discussion on the mailing lists too if I remember rightly (at 
around the same time)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]