[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-devel] core/timers.c with NO_SYS?
From: |
Leon Woestenberg |
Subject: |
[lwip-devel] core/timers.c with NO_SYS? |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:19:41 +0200 |
Hello Simon,
I see you are working on a timers.c implementation in core/.
There is no sys_now() definition for minimal systems (without the
system abstraction layer), so this currently does not compile for me:
#if NO_SYS
/* Initialise timestamp for sys_check_timeouts */
timeouts_last_time = sys_now();
#endif
As core/timers.c seems a core API it must not rely on the availability
of the system layer, i.e. the core functionality must work with
NO_SYS.
Is that assured?
Regards,
--
Leon
--
Leon
--
Leon
- [lwip-devel] core/timers.c with NO_SYS?,
Leon Woestenberg <=
- Re: [lwip-devel] core/timers.c with NO_SYS?, Simon Goldschmidt, 2011/06/11
- Re: [lwip-devel] core/timers.c with NO_SYS?, Leon Woestenberg, 2011/06/11
- Re: [lwip-devel] core/timers.c with NO_SYS?, address@hidden, 2011/06/12
- Re: [lwip-devel] core/timers.c with NO_SYS?, Leon Woestenberg, 2011/06/12
- Re: [lwip-devel] core/timers.c with NO_SYS?, address@hidden, 2011/06/12
- Re: [lwip-devel] core/timers.c with NO_SYS?, Kieran Mansley, 2011/06/12
- Re: [lwip-devel] core/timers.c with NO_SYS?, Leon Woestenberg, 2011/06/12
- Re: [lwip-devel] core/timers.c with NO_SYS?, Kieran Mansley, 2011/06/13
- Re: [lwip-devel] core/timers.c with NO_SYS?, address@hidden, 2011/06/13
- Re: [lwip-devel] core/timers.c with NO_SYS?, Bill Auerbach, 2011/06/13