[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-devel] Versioning System
From: |
Leon Woestenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-devel] Versioning System |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Jun 2011 12:00:38 +0200 |
Simon, Kieran, all,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Kieran Mansley <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 3 Jun 2011, at 22:14, address@hidden wrote:
>
>> However, CVS really annoys me! Since that discussion, I have used CVS, SVN,
>> git and mercurial. By now, I favour a distributed versioning system and I
>> favour git over mercurial since it seems to have a better GUI for windows :-)
>> I'd be happy to see this change too. I think the sensible choices would be
>> git or mercurial, and while I use mercurial most often I don't mind which as
>> they are roughly equivalent in use for me.
>> Perhaps I can re-phrase Simon's question as "does anyone have any objections
>> to us moving to git for version control of lwIP?"
>
No objections, sounds like a good plan. (Although I have been very
silent as a developer, so don't count my vote.)
Next question is probably gitorious.com or github.com?
I think I have seen gitorious come out best here in other open source
projects I work with.
Regards,
--
Leon
Re: [lwip-devel] Versioning System, address@hidden, 2011/06/08
Re: [lwip-devel] Versioning System, Simon Goldschmidt, 2011/06/09