[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lwip-devel] A few issues

From: Simon Kallweit
Subject: Re: [lwip-devel] A few issues
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 14:30:14 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20090318)

Simon Kallweit wrote:
* When using NO_SYS == 1 I get an compiler error because the definition of sys_prot_t is missing. All is fine in NO_SYS == 0 as in this case sys.h includes sys_arch.h which defines sys_prot_t. Shouldn't the sys_arch.h include be moved to the top of sys.h so it gets included for both NO_SYS == 0/1? Or is sys_arch.h only intended to be used in the NO_SYS == 0 case? Where should sys_prot_t then be defined?

Sorry, didn't realize there already exists a bugreport for this. Reading up ...

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]