[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-devel] brain storming about "socket2"
From: |
Micael (abc) |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-devel] brain storming about "socket2" |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:12:19 +0100 (CET) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.16 |
Den On, 2009-01-14, 18:12 skrev Jonathan Larmour:
>> The present sockets API is only really there as a way for people to port
>> existing code for less effort. It's not a great choice for writing
>> something new.
Interesting! Is that the boiled down truth? I was about to use lwip for my
new project, which will not use anything but socket interface!! While I
can certainly understand the need for something lighter in a few
particular places, I would never consider using anything but sockets for a
new project myself. I guess I'll be heading back to Interniche if that is
the case.
Well, I guess better hearing this now, than later, so thanks for that
insight!
>> Jifl
>> --
>> eCosCentric Limited http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos experts
>> Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 1223 245571
>> Registered in England and Wales: Reg No 4422071.
>> ------["Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere"]------ Opinions==mine
Cheers,
Micael
- [lwip-devel] brain storming about "socket2", Piero 74, 2009/01/09
- Re: [lwip-devel] brain storming about "socket2", Jonathan Larmour, 2009/01/09
- Re: [lwip-devel] brain storming about "socket2", Jonathan Larmour, 2009/01/14
- Re: [lwip-devel] brain storming about "socket2", Simon Goldschmidt, 2009/01/15
- Re: [lwip-devel] brain storming about "socket2", Micael (abc), 2009/01/15
- Re: [lwip-devel] brain storming about "socket2", Jonathan Larmour, 2009/01/15
- Re: [lwip-devel] brain storming about "socket2", Micael (abc), 2009/01/15
- RE: [lwip-devel] brain storming about "socket2", bill, 2009/01/15
- Re: [lwip-devel] brain storming about "socket2", Jonathan Larmour, 2009/01/15