Re: [lwip-devel] possible mistake in mem.h

[address@hidden]

Iordan Neshev schrieb:
> void *mem_malloc(mem_size_t size);
> void *mem_calloc(size_t count, size_t size); //  mem_size_t???
>   
Hmm, this is a bug, indeed! But I'd rather solve this the other way 
round: let the size parameter of mem_malloc be size_t, not mem_size_t. 
The reason for that is that it is the same for both MEM_LIBC_MALLOC 
settings.
> I noticed some more "mistakes" like this one, 
> but I'll post them separately if you don't mind.

Please don't hesitate to do so. Some of the recent changes have been 
implemented mostly on 32-bit platforms, so I won't say it's impossible 
that bugs like this have slipped in.

Simon