[lwip-devel] [task #7490] Add return value to sys_mbox_post

[Jonathan Larmour]

Follow-up Comment #32, task #7490 (project lwip):

Both those patches look fine to me.

I think "acksem" might make an unwitting reader think it has something to do
with TCP ACKs, even though it clearly doesn't.

Just keeping it as "sem" would be ok with me. If you did want to change it
may I suggest something like "op_completed". So code would
sys_sem_wait(...->op_completed ...) and sys_sem_signal(...->op_completed)
which sort of reads correctly. But I have no strong opinion, just trying to
throw ideas around.



    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?7490>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/