RE : [lwip-devel] 1.3.0

[Frédéric BERNON]

#6969 Review usage of conn->err in netconn layer
-> Kieran, are you agree ? Can we work on that for 1.3.0 (I don't think there 
is lot of job to do)

#7235 Create timeout framework for NO_SYS=1
-> not really important to me... Also I think we have to talk a little about 
what we want here!
I had some questions in https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?7235# comment#7

>If those (and Kieran's three) are fixed, we should talk about the other bugs 
>again and then prevent new code until 1.3.0 is out, I think.
I'm ok for a freeze step to do some tests. If I remember, there is several 
months, we have talk about having a kind of "unit tests". It was with Thomas if 
I don't do any mistake. Thomas, is it right?
  
====================================
Frédéric BERNON 
HYMATOM SA 
Chef de projet informatique 
Microsoft Certified Professional 
Tél. : +33 (0)4-67-87-61-10 
Fax. : +33 (0)4-67-70-85-44 
Email : address@hidden 
Web Site : http://www.hymatom.fr 
====================================
P Avant d'imprimer, penser à l'environnement
 


-----Message d'origine-----
De : address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden De la part de Goldschmidt Simon
Envoyé : jeudi 22 novembre 2007 09:19
À : lwip-devel
Objet : AW: [lwip-devel] 1.3.0


> Help would be most welcome.  I have a half done implementation of the 
> persist timer, and could create a patch for what I have (basically the 
> code to send the appropriate packets - it just needs calling from the 
> right places in lwIP and then testing).
> 
> The other big task (bug 20199) needs some degree of understanding of 
> TCP to make sure we get it right.  Perhaps if I make a patch for how I 
> think things should be others could review it?

I'm not really what I would call an expert on TCP, but my knowledge of TCP is 
constantly growing ;-) I'd be happy to review/test patches or integrate the 
persist timer into tcp_slowtmr.

As to the other bugs/tasks:

#6969 Review usage of conn->err in netconn layer
- important!

#7235 Create timeout framework for NO_SYS=1
- not really important to me... Also I think we have to talk a little about 
what we want here!

#7421 Implement SO_RCVBU
- nearly finished? What's missing is the listen backlog.
 -> should go in

If those (and Kieran's three) are fixed, we should talk about the other bugs 
again and then prevent new code until 1.3.0 is out, I think.


Simon


_______________________________________________
lwip-devel mailing list
address@hidden http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-devel

Frédéric BERNON.vcf
Description: Frédéric BERNON.vcf