[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-devel] [task #6861] Pimp ip_frag.c
From: |
Simon Goldschmidt |
Subject: |
[lwip-devel] [task #6861] Pimp ip_frag.c |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:46:47 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.1.5) Gecko/20070713 Firefox/2.0.0.5 |
Follow-up Comment #20, task #6861 (project lwip):
Re comment #19:
yes and yes. I didn't really think about it, I was just implementing like it
was. But I like both ideas.
Re comment #18:
It would be OK if it never happend, but what does the reassembled packet look
like if it _does_ happen? We would have to throw away the unfitting fragment
and let the transmission time out...
Whatever we do, we have to check that the boundaries fit or else the
reassembled packet will be wrong.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?6861>
_______________________________________________
Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
- [lwip-devel] [task #6861] Pimp ip_frag.c, Kieran Mansley, 2007/07/13
- [lwip-devel] [task #6861] Pimp ip_frag.c, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/07/13
- [lwip-devel] [task #6861] Pimp ip_frag.c, Jonathan Larmour, 2007/07/20
- [lwip-devel] [task #6861] Pimp ip_frag.c, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/07/20
- [lwip-devel] [task #6861] Pimp ip_frag.c, Thomas Taranowski, 2007/07/23
- [lwip-devel] [task #6861] Pimp ip_frag.c, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/07/23
- [lwip-devel] [task #6861] Pimp ip_frag.c, Thomas Taranowski, 2007/07/23
- [lwip-devel] [task #6861] Pimp ip_frag.c, Jonathan Larmour, 2007/07/26
- [lwip-devel] [task #6861] Pimp ip_frag.c, Jonathan Larmour, 2007/07/26
- [lwip-devel] [task #6861] Pimp ip_frag.c,
Simon Goldschmidt <=
- [lwip-devel] [task #6861] Pimp ip_frag.c, Kieran Mansley, 2007/07/26
- [lwip-devel] [task #6861] Pimp ip_frag.c, Thomas Taranowski, 2007/07/27
- [lwip-devel] [task #6861] Pimp ip_frag.c, Thomas Taranowski, 2007/07/27