[lwip-devel] [task #6861] Pimp ip_frag.c

[Simon Goldschmidt]

Follow-up Comment #14, task #6861 (project lwip):

> Re comment #9:
> Kieran wrote: [..]

I think he meant the new reassembly code which isn't yet written ;-) i.e.
holding the input PBUF_POOLs until a packet is completely received and
passing a pbuf list of those packets to ip_input.

> That being said, a fixed size, permanently allocated large buffer
> seems worse.

Which would result in "we don't need the configuration option" since we want
to be lightweight, not fast? I'll have a look at the code sizes...

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?6861>

_______________________________________________
  Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/