RE : [lwip-devel] Re: [task #7068] lwIP docs: Update, improve, add documentation about using lwIP

[Frédéric BERNON]

While we're at it, can we also have in the "main" list of each general category (task,bug,patch) the "planned release" item. I feel that more interresting than "Submitted On", or "Should Be Finished On".

 

About "Documentation", I should regroup in one ("lwip#cookbook", "lwip#bugs", "lwip#task", "lwip#patch", "lwip#news", "lwip#unbound"), to get this "big" category, and another one with only "lwIP documentation".

 

 

 

====================================
Frédéric BERNON
HYMATOM SA
Chef de projet informatique
Microsoft Certified Professional
Tél. : +33 (0)4-67-87-61-10
Fax. : +33 (0)4-67-70-85-44
Email : address@hiddenr
Web Site : http://www.hymatom.fr
====================================

P Avant d'imprimer, penser à l'environnement

 

-----Message d'origine-----
De : address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden De la part de Goldschmidt Simon
Envoyé : lundi 16 juillet 2007 19:24
À : address@hidden
Objet : RE: [lwip-devel] Re: [task #7068] lwIP docs: Update, improve,add documentation about using lwIP

>> How did someone add the categories for bugs/tasks/etc?
>> Should be the same process, no?
>
> I can add these.  What categories would we like?


While we're at it, can we also update the categories for the bug tracker? I often try to fit something in and find we have way too much categories there!

We currently have contrib, arp, ipv4/6, udp, pbufs & sockets.

I think we could need API (instead of sockets?), icmp, igmp, sys, dhcp, memory management, snmp, autoip & ppp (maybe also netif / network drivers?) or is that too much? Also, the tasks & patches could have the same categories like the bugs, that would be easier and more straightforward, I think.

What do you think?

Simon

Frédéric BERNON.vcf
Description: Frédéric BERNON.vcf