[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-devel] [task #7054] Clarification needed for variable initializati
From: |
Frédéric Bernon |
Subject: |
[lwip-devel] [task #7054] Clarification needed for variable initialization |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Jul 2007 08:09:02 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070515 Firefox/2.0.0.4 |
Follow-up Comment #4, task #7054 (project lwip):
("The C Programming Language" by Kernighan & Ritchie)
4.9 Initialization
Initialization has been mentioned in passing many times so far, but always
peripherally to some other topic. This section summarizes some of the rules,
now that we have discussed the various storage classes.
In the absence of explicit initialization, external and static variables are
guaranteed to be initialized to zero; automatic and register variables have
undefined (i.e., garbage) initial values.
Scalar variables may be initialized when they are defined, by following the
name with an equals sign and an expression:
int x = 1;
char squota = ''';
long day = 1000L * 60L * 60L * 24L; /* milliseconds/day */
For external and static variables, the initializer must be a constant
expression; the initialization is done once, conceptionally before the
program begins execution. For automatic and register variables, the
initializer is not restricted to being a constant: it may be any expression
involving previously defined values, even function calls. For example, the
initialization of the binary search program in Section 3.3 could be written
as
int binsearch(int x, int v[], int n)
{
int low = 0;
int high = n - 1;
73
int mid;
...
}
instead of
int low, high, mid;
low = 0;
high = n - 1;
In effect, initialization of automatic variables are just shorthand for
assignment statements. Which form to prefer is largely a matter of taste. We
have generally used explicit assignments, because initializers in
declarations are harder to see and further away from the point of use.
An array may be initialized by following its declaration with a list of
initializers enclosed in braces and separated by commas. For example, to
initialize an array days with the number of
days in each month:
int days[] = { 31, 28, 31, 30, 31, 30, 31, 31, 30, 31, 30, 31 }
When the size of the array is omitted, the compiler will compute the length
by counting the initializers, of which there are 12 in this case.
If there are fewer initializers for an array than the specified size, the
others will be zero for external, static and automatic variables. It is an
error to have too many initializers. There is no way to specify repetition of
an initializer, nor to initialize an element in the middle of an array without
supplying all the preceding values as well.
Character arrays are a special case of initialization; a string may be used
instead of the braces and commas notation:
char pattern = "ould";
is a shorthand for the longer but equivalent
char pattern[] = { 'o', 'u', 'l', 'd', '
- [lwip-devel] [task #7054] Clarification needed for variable initialization, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/07/03
- RE: [lwip-devel] [task #7054] Clarification needed for variableinitialization, Julian Gardner [RSD], 2007/07/04
- [lwip-devel] [task #7054] Clarification needed for variable initialization, Frédéric Bernon, 2007/07/04
- [lwip-devel] [task #7054] Clarification needed for variable initialization, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/07/04
- [lwip-devel] [task #7054] Clarification needed for variable initialization, Frédéric Bernon, 2007/07/04
- [lwip-devel] [task #7054] Clarification needed for variable initialization,
Frédéric Bernon <=
- [lwip-devel] [task #7054] Clarification needed for variable initialization, Frédéric Bernon, 2007/07/04
- [lwip-devel] [task #7054] Clarification needed for variable initialization, Frédéric Bernon, 2007/07/04
- RE: [lwip-devel] [task #7054] Clarification needed for variable initialization, Goldschmidt Simon, 2007/07/04
- [lwip-devel] [task #7054] Clarification needed for variable initialization, David Empson, 2007/07/04
- [lwip-devel] [task #7054] Clarification needed for variable initialization, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/07/05
- [lwip-devel] [task #7054] Clarification needed for variable initialization, Frédéric Bernon, 2007/07/05
- [lwip-devel] [task #7054] Clarification needed for variable initialization, Frédéric Bernon, 2007/07/05
- [lwip-devel] [task #7054] Clarification needed for variable initialization, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/07/05
- [lwip-devel] [task #7054] Clarification needed for variable initialization, Frédéric Bernon, 2007/07/05
- [lwip-devel] [task #7054] Clarification needed for variable initialization, David Empson, 2007/07/05