[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
[lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:28:58 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Opera/9.21 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) |
Follow-up Comment #41, task #6827 (project lwip):
I quite like your solution conceptually, but agree it does involve some
layering violations and lots of little modifications to the code, so not
easily disabled with #define.
The sorted list is cleaner, but has some bad use cases where you spend more
time sorting than you would searching. Perhaps that's OK though.
I suppose in an ideal world we would just maintain this address hint feature
as an optional extra (as a patch) and those that are interested would apply
it, and those that weren't would stick with the current situation. However,
maintaining patches isn't much fun (at least with CVS - with something like
mercurial it becomes much easier).
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?6827>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
- [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning, (continued)
- [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning, Frédéric Bernon, 2007/06/17
- [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/06/18
- [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/06/18
- [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning, Frédéric Bernon, 2007/06/18
- [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/06/19
- [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning, Jonathan Larmour, 2007/06/19
- Re: [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning, Thomas Mueller, 2007/06/19
- RE: [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning, Goldschmidt Simon, 2007/06/19
- RE: [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning, tmu, 2007/06/21
- [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/06/21
- [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning,
Kieran Mansley <=
- [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/06/24
- [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/06/24
- [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/06/24
- [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/06/24
- [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/06/24
- [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning, Kieran Mansley, 2007/06/25
- [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/06/25
- [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning, Kieran Mansley, 2007/06/26
- [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning, Simon Goldschmidt, 2007/06/26
- [lwip-devel] [task #6827] etharp could need some tuning, Jared Grubb, 2007/06/29