[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: RE : [lwip-devel] additional/optional protocols
From: |
Pettinato, Jim |
Subject: |
RE: RE : [lwip-devel] additional/optional protocols |
Date: |
Thu, 24 May 2007 08:29:29 -0400 |
We have discussed the benefit of adding an 'apps/raw_api' and an
'apps/seq_api' area to the contrib module... and there are plans (right,
Kieran?) to do so soon. I don't recall exactly but perhaps we are
waiting until the next stable release before attacking the CVS
repository layout? And I know Kieran was looking for some assistance in
the form of volunteers for that endeavor as well... (and I'm certainly
willing to help!)
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf
Of Goldschmidt Simon
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 3:00 AM
To: lwip-devel
Subject: RE: RE : [lwip-devel] additional/optional protocols
> A DNS client could be something to share, because it's
> something than everyone could need. From memory, Jim
> Pettinato has ported the uIP resolver to lwIP. You can ask
> him if he can share it with you. Look for the thread "BSD API
> tcp echo server port" in April, in mailing list archives...
Agree
>
> PPPoE could be an extension because I think like classic PPP,
> there is real interaction with the stack.
Agree
>
> But SNTP, SMTP, RTP, Telnet, FTP, TFTP are only working with
> the lwIP's API, and not with other parts. So, I don't think
> it is in the scope of lwIP. But it's my point of view, wait
> for others answers...
I'd like to see them in CVS/contrib or somehow create another pool of
available application code using lwip API.
Simon
_______________________________________________
lwip-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-devel