lwip-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE : RE : [lwip-devel] Snmp changes


From: Frédéric BERNON
Subject: RE : RE : [lwip-devel] Snmp changes
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 10:42:40 +0200

To be precise, "mib_" will be better, because there are in mib2.c, and other 
struct seems to be prefix with it. But it's not matching with atentry, 
attable_id... But, you can let it I think (or ask to Christiaan Simons?). If 
you change something, is it possible you fix these minor warnings ?

src\core\snmp\mib2.c (3657) : warning: variable "lport" was set but never used
src\core\snmp\mib2.c (3657) : warning: variable "rport" was set but never used
src\core\snmp\msg_in.c (544) : warning: variable "np" was set but never used

Thank you if you can...

>The problem is that some editors don't break the line and you can't see 
>anything beyond, say, 90 lines.
Someone always got a just editor??? :) Ok.

  
====================================
Frédéric BERNON 
HYMATOM SA 
Chef de projet informatique 
Microsoft Certified Professional 
Tél. : +33 (0)4-67-87-61-10 
Fax. : +33 (0)4-67-70-85-44 
Email : address@hidden 
Web Site : http://www.hymatom.fr 
====================================
P Avant d'imprimer, penser à l'environnement
 


-----Message d'origine-----
De : address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden De la part de Goldschmidt Simon
Envoyé : mardi 3 avril 2007 10:19
À : lwip-devel
Objet : RE : [lwip-devel] Snmp changes



> Ok. I just think is "strange" to only use "g_" prefix in this
> case (snmp_ is more in lwip style?). Is it something to 

Ok, you're probably right about that. I only wanted to get rid of the warning. 
And as I don't even know what than name 'at_node' stands for (I'm not even 
using the snmp part), I didn't know a better name for it.

> define or add in the contrib.txt ? I also got a style
> question: there is some extra LF in some code. Is it to avoid 
> to reach column 80 (or other)? Is there any rules to respect 

Yes, I think.

> on that? I prefer to let editors do the "break" than do it
> manually, just because all editors don't do it with the same rules

The problem is that some editors don't break the line and you can't see 
anything beyond, say, 90 lines.


_______________________________________________
lwip-devel mailing list
address@hidden http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-devel

Attachment: Frédéric BERNON.vcf
Description: Frédéric BERNON.vcf


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]