[lwip-devel] [bug #19157] lwip_close problems

[Frédéric Bernon]

Follow-up Comment #25, bug #19157 (project lwip):

If one day, we integrate SO_LINGER, so I think that adding SO_DONTLINGER
could be done in the same time. First, because it is already defined in
sockets.h (for source code compatibility I think), second, because there will
no lot of job to do. I could be useful to someone who activate SO_LINGER on a
sockets, and, due to his application or protocol, need to come back to
SO_DONTLINGER. 

But this is not the first problem. Before anything else, I have to provide
informations about the problem I see to be sure that the current close really
do the job it should do (and it seems I "alone" with this problem)...


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?19157>

_______________________________________________
  Message posté via/par Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/