[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-devel] lwIP 0.7.1 released -- fixes two ARP bugs
From: |
Leon Woestenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-devel] lwIP 0.7.1 released -- fixes two ARP bugs |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 22:23:41 +0100 |
Jani,
> what branches are we going to use from now on for regular development?
>
HEAD
> I thought it was something like use HEAD from which we tag 0.X releases,
> than go on with HEAD and major bugfixes only go back to 0.X branch
> making 0.X.Y releases, then with other features in HEAD we make a
> 0.(X+1) and so on.
>
Yes, this is the exact plan.
For correctness: we _branch_ 0.X from HEAD at the moment we tag 0.X.0.
> For possibly disruptive changes each developer makes his own branch from
> which when reviewed they go to HEAD?
>
For grand changes, yes, we move into some kind of DEVEL branch. I can
think of two examples which I would can "grand changes":
- Integrate pbuf code with a memory pool model.
- Make lwIP fully multi-threading safe.
> what do you think of the above?
>
Yes, correct.
> I ask because I don't see the recent fixes for ARP neither in HEAD nor
> DEVEL. I also recall DEVEL had some minor changes vs HEAD last time I
> looked (copyright for 2004 among others)
>
I mistakenly fixed the bug in STABLE-0_7 whereas I should have fixed it
in HEAD first and merge it to STABLE-0_7.
Also, the DEVEL changes were done under the old scheme. I still have to
merge DEVEL into HEAD.
Will do that right away, thanks for seeing my mistake.
Leon.
- [lwip-devel] lwIP 0.7.1 released -- fixes two ARP bugs, Leon Woestenberg, 2004/02/05
- Re: [lwip-devel] lwIP 0.7.1 released -- fixes two ARP bugs, Jani Monoses, 2004/02/06
- Re: [lwip-devel] lwIP 0.7.1 released -- fixes two ARP bugs,
Leon Woestenberg <=
- [lwip-devel] CVS, devel tree, 64-bit cleanness and buffer management, lukem . lwip, 2004/02/15
- Re: [lwip-devel] CVS, devel tree, 64-bit cleanness and buffer management, lukem . lwip, 2004/02/15
- [lwip-devel] DEVEL branch uncompilable, lukem . lwip, 2004/02/15
- Re: [lwip-devel] DEVEL branch uncompilable, Leon Woestenberg, 2004/02/16
- Re: [lwip-devel] DEVEL branch uncompilable, lukem . lwip, 2004/02/16