[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Oct 2003 10:19:44 +0100 (BST) |
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> With that in mind, I'd propose that naked casts be replaced with macros
> named for the operation they're trying to achieve, similar in principle to
> the h2n macros/functions. This allows the cast macro to be tuned to
> different architectures in one place, or to be replaced with a function as
> needed.
I'm not sure I understand this concept (the different types of casts - not
using macros!). Can you explain what the difference's might be between
the macros for the different types of casts?
Kieran
- Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix, Paul Riley, 2003/10/03
- [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix, Paul Riley, 2003/10/20
- Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix, Kenneth Porter, 2003/10/20
- Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix, Kenneth Porter, 2003/10/22
- Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix, Kieran Mansley, 2003/10/23
- Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix, Kenneth Porter, 2003/10/24
- Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix, Leon Woestenberg, 2003/10/24
- Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix, David Vrabel, 2003/10/24
- Re: [lwip-devel] Bug in Checksum implementation and ARP fix, Atte Kojo, 2003/10/30